Charles Lee






Ideation Strategist, Networker, and Compassionary

Thoughts on Missional Church


Feb 5th 2010
20 Comments
respond
trackback

I’m writing to you from the Verge Conference, a conference in Austin led by my good friend Michael Stewart. Verge was designed to further the Church’s conversation about what it means to live missionally in our various contexts.

Verge has been a source of great affirmation and challenge for many of the things that I value as a Christ-follower (e.g, love for Jesus, care for humanity, collaboration, generosity, etc.). I love the heart of this conference! It’s the kind of Christianity that does not desire to do a bait and switch with the Gospel. Rather, it seeks to live authentically in love for our God and ALL of mankind.

I think Verge is a great first step towards intentionally conversing and networking with missional churches (i.e., churches that desire to embody the loving mission of Jesus through tangible acts of care). It has been encouraging to meet so many that are actually living out their faith in a real kind of way.

For those who are engaged in this conversation, I’d like to offer the followings areas I think we need to engage as it relates to being “missional”:

Vocational Integration

If missional has to do with the entire church participating in the mission, it is essential that some of the leading voices speaking into this conversation come from outside of vocational ministry. It’s not to negate the voice of church leaders. Rather, it’s to add the often unheard voices of professionals engaging their faith in their respective vocations at some of these Christian gatherings. I’m concerned that this conversation may turn into a church leadership issue. May our focus continue to be Kingdom before local church specific.

Diverse Input

As far as I have seen in the missional conversation, there appears to be very little representation of ethnic and cultural diversity. Is the missional conversation just another conversation about mainstream, white churches? I know that’s not the heart behind most (if not all) of the leaders of this conversation. May we collectively protect ourselves from becoming a narrowly focused expression of faith. Otherwise, we should call it what it is and stop acting like we’re inclusive.

I’m not saying that we should invite voices solely on the basis of color. I’m saying this because there are people of color that definitely live missionally that all of us could learn from if we chose to look for them and build relationships.

Female Voices

In a similar light, there definitely needs to be more female voices in this conversation. Regardless of one’s theological background, if this conversation is about the entire church where “everyone plays”, how could we exclude the voices of women? The amount of exclusion may be unintentional, but nevertheless, it will end up hurting and limiting God’s movement if not changed.

As mentioned above, I love what’s forming at Verge. I hope that we can all contribute to its future formation.

Many thanks to the Verge Team for facilitating this meaningful conversation!


Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share

This post is tagged , , , ,

20 Comments

  1. New Blog Post – Thoughts on Missional Church #verge10 – http://www.charlestlee.com/ministry/thou...
    via Twitoaster

  2. Charles:

    I participated remotely with some of the main sessions and could not agree more. The spirit expressed by this group of Christ followers is so practical, loving and positive.

    I so yearn to hear the perspective of women in this conversation. How are they raising families in this tension of “not playing church”? How are the relational strengths that women typically bring being brought to this conversation?

    Thanks for this post. Your perspective is always appreciated, Charles.

    Dawn Carter
    @decart

  3. Charles, you’re speaking my language! As an atheist of 37 years my perspective on ministry is not traditional. Additionally having an ethnic and cultural perspective that is not white suburbia and being in an interracial marriage, you om touch on things I have been struggling to see come about through being part of a relational, missional church. While it seems as if the time and place for that were not right for us through our church plant in Sacramento, I hope that our passion, experience, and love for God’s church and humanity will find a home in one of the most unchurched areas of the United States as we prepare to move to Portland, OR at the end of this month.

    Appreciating all the tweets on #verge10…thanks!!!

  4. thewinnersedge

    RT @charlestlee: New Blog Post – Thoughts on Missional Church #verge10 – http://www.charlestlee.com/ministry/thou...
    via Twitoaster

  5. Charles — Great thoughts! I’m with you whole-heartedly, and I believe many missional-minded folks are as well. As you wrote, hopefully gatherings like Verge will be the first step in the right direction of creating a movement that expresses the fullness, beauty and breadth of the body of Christ and leads to compassionate service to the world God so loves.

  6. Good thoughts here, and this follows along with what I’ve been feeling lately as well (posted this week and a few weeks previous). Always good to hear thoughts that I’ve had in the mouths of others – now to keep it moving forward in Him.

  7. Mike Rusch

    Great post Charles…great post

  8. Thanks for your comments everyone :)

    Dawn, I had people like you in mind that really do live missionally in all areas of life. Thanks for being a living example of what it means to embody God’s love to the world.

    Dave, blessings on you. I’m excited for the journey that God has placed you on. You and your wife are amazing people. I’m glad that living missionally is not predicated on whether or not one pastors a church.

    Daniel, love you’re optimistic attitude!

    So glad this resonates with both you, Antoine and Mike. :)

    Also, I had a conversation with Mark DeYmaz and loved his insight on how many multi-ethnic communities already live missionally because their people do reflect their city. Serving them has led to natural opportunities of serving others in their respective cities. Some good thoughts there. Therefore, diversity is a necessary way to go if we desire to be missional.

  9. Keith Jenkins

    Charles as an African American attending Verge 2010, i couldn’t agree with you more. There are significant voices missing from this conversation. As you know most of these invitations are given through networking or after the exposure of resources that have been written by an individual. I am concerned that some of the networks are not expansive/inclusive enough. Diversity will demand more of all of us, and put us in unfamiliar waters at times. Like being surround by an Asian gang at Verge, like I have been. :) I am appreciative of the friendships that have been developed. Through such encounters we broaden ourselves and the deep seated fears/assumptions we may have are allayed. It is a good fight, and worth engaging in…..I love a good fight!!!

  10. andyhoultberg

    @charlestlee if we have to try to be missional, it’s to late :)
    via Twitoaster

  11. andyhoultberg

    @charlestlee if we have to try to be missional, it’s to late :)
    via Twitoaster

  12. Your session on Social Justice affirmed my convictions yet left me with questions:

    How do you handle detractors? When I present myself this way, critics start calling out, “Marxist!” and “Babykiller!” Yes, they call me Babykiller because I vote for those who are seeking social justice. I try to explain that it’s about so much more than the one issue, but my entire being is invalidated because I’m socially liberal which means I side with babykillers.

    Thanks for all your work at the conference, on these issues, and your passion. You want to know about the voice of the women– the women are raised up when they are protected by the men. We know we have value when we matter to you. When what matters to us matters to you.

  13. Good words Keith! So glad you were a part of it. Always love the relationships that are formed through such gatherings. I think your point about expanding the network is vital to this conversation.

    Thanks Amy for your note. Do people who oppose you really use those words? If so, that’s unfortunate…even if they disagree with you. I think definitely need to distinguish the person from the argument. My only response would be that you would not response with the same kinds of words. I’m hoping you’re using hyperbole with your example. I know plenty of people who would disagree with you and yet keep the conversation constructive and civil.

  14. Several “random” responses from someone not there, but rooting for all of this…

    1) Congregations, as structures, are rarely missional– or don’t tend to last long in that mode (i.e., not more than a generation if that). Congregations are the same as churches– but are rather one format of Christian community among others that together form the network called church. Other formats of Christian community— typically things like neo-monastic communities or intentional missional groups– are far better at delivering on missional by all participants in real time. When I hear about “planting missional churches” what I’ve typically seen actually happen is an attempt to plant a congregation with the hope that it will be missional– and that tends to be #fail.

    2) There’s a reason this conversation is happening this way in predominantly “white” (i.e., in the US, dominant culture) contexts. It’s partly because it doesn’t NEED to happen as much in non-dominant culture contexts, because there the congregations themselves very often already are and have been “missional” for decades if not centuries.

    When you live at the margins, that’s more possible. When you’re in the cultural mainstream, congregations won’t be missional– other formats of Christian community have to take up the slack, and sometimes do.

    All that means at least two things. One is non-poor white folk are woefully behind. A lot of what we’re talking about is stuff other folks have taken for granted for a long time and so see no need to talk about. It’s just what they do and who they are and how they do it. They don’t need a label to describe that. Yet white folks in this conversation may tend to come off as if we’re on the cutting edge and blazing a new path for everyone, while in fact we may be in deep need of major remediation.

    Another is social networks. How deeply are folks of various ethnicities actually deep enough in the social networks of each other that they even know how to talk meaningfully to one another? There are reasons separate networks have developed over time. Those reasons aren’t entirely passé. But if we want more non-dominant-culture voices to inform this conversation, all of us in every culture will need to work at building cross-cultural social networking better than we have– myself included. This, too, takes time– and sometimes a long, long time.

    And here we may have to be careful about our own version of “bait and switch.” Are we seeking to make the conversation more diverse simply to validate our own current commitments to the missional conversation, or are we seeking to do this genuinely to learn and perhaps correct the defects, gaps and perhaps culturally-bound and blinding assumptions of the current conversation? Of the folks I’ve met, I know we’re really wanting to do the former. What I also know is just how easy it is actually to do the latter.

    3) For all the talk that “missional” is not a predominantly evangelical conversation, the facts remain that it pretty often is, and in that milieu the role of women has historically been muted or diverted from the mainstream of the conversation. So let’s be realistic (and so perhaps a bit generous) about inclusion as more of a generational project than, perhaps, an instantaneous one. That doesn’t mean we don’t work to include as many voices as possible now– but it does mean that perhaps we recognize that the dream will take a little longer than a decade to realize.

  15. Error in line 2 of the paragraph labeled 1)

    SHOULD read– Congregations are NOT the same as churches…

    Peace,

    Taylor Burton-Edwards

  16. i listened to the message last night as i read my emails. I had to stop – the emails that is. i really believe Christ’s body is starting to get this. People who are looking for God in this broken world are being drawn to the fragrance of a movement who ‘s mantra is “live to give”. Good sermon grasshopper.

  17. Good insights Taylor!

    I thought I had responded to you earlier, but I guess I didn’t :)

    Love the way you think…I definitely think you have some good insights into non-dominant cultures. Nevertheless, I have seen minority cultures not live missionally. In fact, many of them are as ethno-centric as some mainstream churches. I think the multi-ethnic and multi-cultural conversation has a lot to offer us on this topic.

    By the way, good word on social networks.

    Sean, thanks for stopping by. Wow, you actually listened to one of my messages. Honored :)

Leave a Reply